<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">1832</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Cultural Analytics</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2371-4549</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Center for Digital Humanities, Princeton University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://culturalanalytics.org/">Website: Journal of Cultural Analytics</self-uri>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">11824</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22148/001c.11824</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Commentary</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Send us your null results</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Piper</surname>
            <given-names>Andrew</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2020-01-22">
        <day>22</day>
        <month>1</month>
        <year>2020</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2021-05-03">
        <year>2020</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>5</volume>
      <issue seq="0">1</issue>
      <issue-title>Articles in 2020</issue-title>
      <elocation-id>11824</elocation-id>
      <permissions>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">
              http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
            </ali:license_ref>
          <license-p>
              This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0">Creative Commons Attribution License (4.0)</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
            </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://culturalanalytics.org/article/11824.pdf"/>
      <self-uri content-type="xml" xlink:href="https://culturalanalytics.org/article/11824.xml"/>
      <self-uri content-type="json" xlink:href="https://culturalanalytics.org/article/11824.json"/>
      <self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://culturalanalytics.org/article/11824"/>
      <abstract>
        <p>A considerable amount of work has been produced in quantitative fields addressing what has colloquially been called the “replication crisis.”1 By this is meant three related phenomena: 1) the low statistical power of many studies resulting in an inability to reproduce a similar effect size; 2) a bias towards selecting statistically “significant” results for publication; and 3) a tendency to not make data and code available for others to use.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>data</kwd>
        <kwd>replication</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
